|
| Sunday, January 4, 2009 |
| Just another Crime ! |
|
Israel massacre civilians in Gaza market (HERE)
A must see video of Israeli war crimes in Gaza. Tens of kids and women were killed for no reason by terrorist Israeli air strike.THIS IS ISRAEL .. THESE ARE OUR CHILDREN Labels: Arab world, islam, Palestine |
posted by AbdElRaHmaN Ayyash @ 7:08 AM  |
|
|
|
| Tuesday, December 9, 2008 |
| MB Bloggers Could Be Washington's New Hope & My comment ! |
This is the Essay , My comment is below !
By JOSEPH MAYTON (Middle East Times)
Published: December 09, 2008
Washington has long looked for moderate Islamists in the Middle East. And while Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood is often thrown into the same "extremists" basket as Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza, a growing trend within the Brotherhood's younger generation could hold the key to winning Muslim hearts and minds - at least that's what the young reformers hope.
Abdel Rahman Ayyash, 18, is one of them. He, along with a number of other Brotherhood reformers, has recently called for major changes within one of Egypt's oldest and most powerful opposition groups. Ayyash is quick to point out that America is "not the enemy," despite the frustration Arabs have been feeling for many years.
"I love American movies and my favorite actors are Charlise Theron and Brad Pitt," says Ayyash, who has established himself as one of the prominent young bloggers in the North African nation.
These reformer-bloggers – most of whom are under 30 – are calling for dramatic changes in Brotherhood policies, including removing the movement's slogan "Islam is the solution" from use, as it "creates divisions within Egyptian society."
Washington views Islamic organizations in the Middle East with great caution, but this generation of Islamist-bloggers could give the new incoming U.S. administration of Barack Obama flexibility in beginning a dialogue that could lead to real change.
Mustafa Naggar, another outspoken blogger, says that Washington has nothing to fear from the Brotherhood.
"We want democracy and freedom, just like anyone else, so America doesn't need to fear us. We are not violent and do not want to force our religion on people," he says.
Khalil al-Anani, an expert on the Muslim Brotherhood movement, says that while Ayyash, Naggar and many like-thinking young men within the movement are not among the majority, their presence is an opportunity for the new U.S. administration to try and reconcile with the moderate elements within the traditionally conservative Islamic organization.
Any breakthrough would bode well for any U.S. efforts made to reconcile with similar traditionally conservative Islamic organizations, Anani argues, and ultimately heal the perceived injuries felt by both the United States and the Islamic world.
But Anani sees an uphill struggle for the reformers.
"The problem is that despite how outspoken they are, we cannot assume all young people within the Brotherhood are reformers like this," Anani says. "For the dozens of young bloggers calling for changes in the Brotherhood, there are hundreds, possibly thousands, of others who remain stalwart in their conservatism."
But, the bloggers say, they are gaining steam and winning over the hearts and minds of Egyptians who formerly viewed the Brotherhood with much skepticism.
Among the myriad aspects of the Brotherhood the new generation would like to see changed is the rigidity of what they term "outdated" modes of discussion within the leadership.
Ayyash and reformer-blogger Abdel-Rahman Mansour, 21, argue that there needs to be much more openness within the organization in order for it to keep pace with Egyptian society which is demanding more transparency as a whole. They also say that all opposition groups need to work together to create real and viable political changes.
"More openness will create more ideas," Ayyash says, "and this has to be done openly so that all voices [within the Brotherhood] can have their say and not be turned away by the older leaders."
Mansour says he respects American traditions of freedom and hopes Egyptians will be able to learn from them. He believes that middle ground can be created that will allow for an Islamic party to come to power. But that power must be tempered within the confines of a strong constitution, he says, much like Turkey.
"I believe [that as a ruling party] the Brotherhood in Egypt could operate in a similar way to Turkey, where an Islamic party is in power, but is not implementing a conservative view of Sharia," he says.
"[Egypt] is not 100 percent Muslim and people have different ideas about what laws should be established. We cannot cause more people to get frustrated by [ourselves in] government, so I think a Turkish-style government would be a good idea."
Anani, the expert on the Muslim Brotherhood, thinks that Washington should seize the moment to reach out to the reformer-bloggers.
"The reformers and their belief in democratic ideals could be a precursor to changing the Islamic face of the Middle East," Anani says.
However, Dina Shehata, a political expert on Egypt's opposition parties, argues that U.S. influence has no place in internal Egyptian politics.
"I don't think this is the business of any American administration, young or old," Shehata says, "because this is a dynamic that must be determined internally, both within the Brotherhood and within Egyptian society."
She does concede, though, that the new Brotherhood generation does create an opportunity for new routes to be taken with Islamist organizations in the region, but that this must be done "with all young bloggers and activists" if it is going to have any affect.
Anani disagrees, arguing that it is an opportunity for the United States to change its perception of the Arab world and the bloggers offer a route that does not cozy up to Islamists.
"It is an opportunity for America to make inroads into an organization that has been stigmatized by Washington's foreign policy of late."
But Shehata and other observers in Egypt think that any reform movement within the Brotherhood is likely fizzle out and fail to achieve its goals.
Mansour and Ayyash and the dozens of other bloggers pushing for reforms say differently.
"We will succeed, because we have to if the Brotherhood is going to survive and move into the realm of honest political dialogue," Mansour says. "Egypt is ready for a change and so is the rest of the world; we are just pushing change along using our own means."
---------------------------------------------
First of all , Happy Eid,
As a blogger from Muslim Brotherhood and I was mentioned by name in this essay , I feel that I'm involved in something more than my ability !
Joseph .. the American journalist who has been in Egypt for the last three years said that We are as MB bloggers are the hope of America in ME .
Without doubt this means that all of us are hands of America in Egypt and Middle East, and that's a big mistake . we are blogging because of Reform and Democracy. When we feel that our blogging will make the opposite result , I think that stop blogging will be the right decision !
I'm talking about what Ms Dina Shehata mentioned in this article ," she argues that U.S. influence has no place in internal Egyptian politics."
Personally , I don't have any problem with our (AbdulRahman Mansour, Mostafa Alnaggar and me ) talking . My whole problem is with the context of speech , Joseph make me feel such a guilty person that is setting in opposition with MB, and this is not true .
In addition of that , I think that Mr.Khalil's vision is right to some extent, specially when he talked about the"Conservative" Majority and the "Reformer" minority, and the Uphill mission that reformers face and will face within their "struggle" to express their view points among MB.
I expect that MB members won't accept this article's message , most of them will see this article as a message to the United States :" You have a loyal followers here" . On the other hand , NDP's government and the regime in Egypt will consider our speech as some kind of Flatter to the U.S. and this may affect negatively on the originally-strained relations between MB and the Egyptian Regime.
Finally , I hope that we can make a difference within MB, and we will :)
note:
I don't like rad Pitt very much , but Tom Hanks is the MAN :D:D:D Labels: Egyptian Regime, Muslim Brotherhood |
| posted by AbdElRaHmaN Ayyash @ 10:40 AM |
|
|
|
| Sunday, August 10, 2008 |
| China .. Egypt .. One coin !! |
Egypt applied for hosting the 2010 World cup .. the result was Big ZERO .. Zero votes for Egypt .
I think that's natural , The Corrupted Regime in Egypt was imagining that "FIFA" would accept Egypt by only some loud voice !
China applied for the Olympic Games , they accepted the Chinese Candidate, although his bad human rights history.
I just wanna say that , I'm - as an Egyptian Blogger - appeal all Sports organizations not to accept any Egyptian candidature to any event .
Egypt has a very shameful folder in human rights and civil rights .
Egyptian authorities detained the Blogger ( Mohammed Ref'at), without any reason but his political views.
Mohammed is a blogger from Muslim Brotherhood , he classified as a pragmatic activist, we all should try to help Mohammed, he accused of being activist on facebook !!!
so , they want us not to say a word, as the Chinese Regime.
My statues on FaceBook is "uncensored" to the Chinese Government and the Egyptian one !
in Egypt, Bloggers are being detained .
in China, They Are being Killed
 Labels: Egyptian Regime, Home Problems |
| posted by AbdElRaHmaN Ayyash @ 7:17 AM |
|
|
|
| Saturday, March 29, 2008 |
| Geert Wilder's movie |
|
I watched it now,
I just want to say a word.
this movie is a big fake, this is not our religion , the words in it are cut to give the opposite meening.
the movie has more than one expression that wasn't translated accurately from Arabic.
The weak directed movie sent hatred messages to all muslims, put terrorists and strugglers in the same basket.
I'm sorry to say that , Geert is a loser.
he gave us some pictures from EU demonstrations, from some new nazis, or some ( stupid ) muslims and generalization his judgement to all muslims.
We don't beleive in holocaust, but we heared Ehod Barac in the last month , when he said that he will make a real hollocaust in Gaza Strip !!!!
"Fitna" is another evidence about the misunderstanding and the great hole between Muslim World and the Western world, I'm sorry to generalization, Ok , we can say there are some extremists that wanted to distort Islam and the Muslim Peoples.
We - Muslims - must see a practical way to object this movie , in a peaceful and ((formal)) way .
last thing, I want those who read in English to read more about Mohammed PBUH and Islam , and the Muslim Civilization in the middle Era.
I'm sorry for bad spelling :$ .
thank you
Peace be Upon u.
AbdelRahman
------------------------
Update:
here is a response for Fitna Movie,
titled :"Almouftinoun"
I think it's great response .
thanks for The Arab European League . Labels: islam |
| posted by AbdElRaHmaN Ayyash @ 7:46 AM |
|
|
|
| Thursday, March 13, 2008 |
| Why Did They Arrest Hamza?! |
As an employee in ikhwanweb under the management of Engineer Khaled Hamza (ikhwanweb's editor in chief) , I was and still asking ,, why did the Egyptian regime arrest him?
Khaled Hamza, another reformist in jail, He has been arrested by state security in Feb. 2008 , One of the free word - victims in Egypt, He is one of leaders of the solidarity campaign with 40 reformist who were referred to the military trials .
I'm trying to find any reasons to justify stupidity of this regime , I didn't found any reason but .. it's stupidity !!!
Did Khaled threaten this corrupted regime ?
Did he open fire on them ?
of course NO
Khaled didn't this deeds, he believes in peaceful change, and people's ability for change.
Hamza was a free voice, he was able to reach all over the world bu his small team, so , he annoyed the corrupted regime in Egypt, so.. they decided , this voice must stop !
Hamza wasn't the first one who was arrested because of his free pen, and he wasn't the last, the question again ... why???
In my opinion , these are some points as an answer for this question ,, why did they arrest Hamza?
(1)
Hamza - for muslim brotherhood - was the gate to the outer world !, Egyptian regime closed all legal gates that we can show our point of view through them , so (ikhwanweb.com) - the official English website for muslim brotherhood - was this gate , then , Our Regime Tried to delete this gate by arresting Khaled Hamza .
(2)
Hamza was an open-mind person, We can say that there are few of people like Hamza in MB, so .. Hamza is a great power in Muslim Brotherhood, his relations with youth, bloggers and activists of all the political spectrum in Egypt made this power, Egyptian Regime don't bear united opposition in Egypt , SO, Stupid regime saw that he may break down this great power by detaining Hamza.
(3)
In the near past, after referring 40 MB reformists to the military tribunals , Hamza with his known intellegence managed the campaign to defend MB's detainees in the media , he build bridges with Human Rights activists, to show the HR violations to whole the world, and he did it .
(4)
Because of the next Municipal elections, Dictatorial Regime in Egypt, wanted to cause a loss in MB media power by arresting Hamza, especially , to stop MB from embarrassing it in front of World public opinion.
(5)
This Dectatorial and corrupted regime wanted to send a message to opponents in Egypt " we know every thing, your efforts to turn to a democratic society will make you lose much " , the message was received , this was clear by preventing MB candidates from applying for the Municipal elections.
(6)
I think that Egyptian Regime wanted to know - after arresting Hamza - the Reaction of activists and human rights organizations, to know in more specyfying .. who is Khaled Hamza?!, they wanted to know the effect of Hamza's absence for the Campaign of Supporting those 40 reformists behind bars.
I miss Eng Khaled, I really miss him
Labels: Khaled Hamza, Military Trials, Muslim Brotherhood |
| posted by AbdElRaHmaN Ayyash @ 6:04 AM |
|
|
|
| Monday, February 18, 2008 |
| Egyptian History X |
 Ramsey Clark .. the former US attorney general in press conference after preventing from attending Military trial ( Autumn 2007)
The Regime is still decorating facts , still arresting people without any legal titles, still hold military trials for reformists, and this all continue with blessing of the international system and especially United states.
Muslim Brotherhood as an opponents group get it's legitimacy from the Egyptian people, and legally banned, has no weapon to defend itself but it's right and actual land in Egyptian streat.
Unfortunately, we found the essential power in world today - US - support this unjust regime , not only that but also justifies this regime's crimes .
We have nothing to do but call for justice, MB invited great names in Human Rights organizations and Civil society foundations in free world states.
Ramsey Clark, Mahdi Bray, Cindy Sheehan and Violette Daguerre .. names in the series of activists who came to Egypt to watch Military tribunals for Muslim Brotherhood , those all agreed with the just cause of MB and Egyptian Opponents in general .
During the trial, which lasted nearly a year, Brotherhood continued struggling for their cause, and regime continued arresting members of MB and close their private firms , United Sates administration watched all of these Human rights violations .. did they pressure regime to stop it ?!! .. they didn't .. so far
I'm a young Egyptian citizen , Speak the words of thousands in Egypt ... speak to Human Rights activists and American Administration
The Egyptian Regime close the only way to be a moderate Muslim, The Regime Push us to be extremists, we don't know how to deal with this corrupted regime .. you are calling for democracy, justice and freedom .. we are waiting for an actual moves to free opponents , I'm afraid from being detained because of my words.
Finally, what I wanna say in a few words : Save yourself by saving Muslims from extremism , this extremism will be a fact very soon, I don't talk about some extremists in Afghanistan or Pakistan .. I'm talking about the extremist peoples , I'm talking about the extremist generation, save us, save yourself and free Muslim Brotherhood.
-------
I hope to deliver my voice to those who can do something for the next generation, they are the only hope .. the last resort.
Labels: America, Home Problems, Military Trials, Muslim Brotherhood |
| posted by AbdElRaHmaN Ayyash @ 2:07 PM |
|
|
|
| Monday, January 14, 2008 |
| The next administration in America and us (My Arabic Blog in English) |
Last month I wrote an issue about American election and the presidential race and the relationship between the next administration in the White House and the Arab world , and Muslim brotherhood too.
I found most of my issue translated in English by Tarek Amr .
this is the link of global voices online topic and here is what was written there:
"Abdel Rahman Ayyash- Al Ghareeb - wrote an introduction here about the Presidential elections and the struggle between the two major parties in the US:
In America there are two main parties, the current ruling party, the Republicans, and represented by George Bush as the President, and the majority party in the Congress, the Democrats. And it was represented earlier by Bill Clinton, and [may be] it will be represented in the next election by Hilary Clinton, the candidate who will most likely become the first women to become the President of the United States.
Whoever follows the American media, will know well that the struggle for the power is not is far beyond a struggle between individuals. It's an organization-based struggle, where major firms support candidate campaigns. For example, Hilary got much support (Although she herself criticised the Republicans for the same reason and called them (Firmians) for their dependency on the support of firms).
Abdel Rahman Ayyash describes himself in the “About Me” section that he tries to show good model of a young Egyptian Muslim man, who believes that Islam is the only solution to all problems we face. Hence he tries here to analyze the presidential elections race from an Islamic - and perhaps a Muslim Brotherhood - point of view:
I will try here to show some suitable flexibility in order to try to understand the American voters theory, and how those voters evaluate the candidate who can represent them in the elections. For sure it is not possible to compare the American society with that Arab one (except the Lebanese society), in terms of political awareness, which represents an important aspect in the culture of most of the citizens of the United States.
Ayyash then continues to analyse George W. Bush policies and it's effect on the voters decision in the next elections:
Bush bad policies in general, led to a severe weakness in the trust between the American citizen and his president. The huge gap (which is somehow new), between incomes in the United States, and the big drop in dollar prices, as well as the social and national security issues and health care ones, and before all these comes the main issue … Iraq.
So … the situation now generally … dictates that Bush administration had a big failure (I am not talking here about Fox news and its reports) but … the evidence that the Bush administration has failed, it is the results of the polls that shows how his popularity is at its lowest levels now. Also the results of the Congress elections proves that the Americans are looking for a counter-Bush ideology. An opposite ideology for Bush's one in my point of view is an opposite ideology of the White House hawks … the opposite of Dick Cheney … in other words … the opposite of the Neo-Conservatives.
I think the American voter is really aware of this, and that's why we are seeing an increase in the evidence that the Democrats will succeed in the coming elections, because the Democrats lay the question … Who will get out of Iraq first? And the answer for sure is for their side. (Even though Hilary Clinton herself is supporting the war on Iraq and Afghanistan).
He adds that most of the Arabs don't see any difference between the Democrats and the Republicans:
The majority of the Arab street doesn't see any difference between Clinton's administration that laid a siege on Iraq that led to the death of half a million Iraqi children due to the stupidity of two regimes one of them speaks Arabic, and between Bush's administration that started a war on Iraq.
One of the commenters on the Neo-Conservatives topic in Aljazeeera.net wrote:
“There are no Hawks and Pigeons in the American administration … Both of the Republicans and the Democrats plays are a pre-written role in a show, and they all have one goal at the end, but the methods are different … For example … Clinton started a siege on Iraq that lead to the death of half a million children … He killed them all but without sending a single tank there … while George Bush on the other hand declared war and attacked children and old men, and so on. So they all hate us, and have evil intentions and plan to ruin our countries, but each according to his role”.
I can say that many Arabs think the same way, the way that I am not able blame or comment on.
Ayyash then tries to shed some light on the main differences between the Republicans and the Democrats:
The clichés and the broad lines of the United States leadership on the world, are found a lot in the Republicans speeches. They consider the Middle East as the cornerstone of their control on the New World Order.
Energy independence, is one of these broad lines, where most of the Americans care a lot about the independence of energy in this period, (they believe that the Wahhabi's may practice some pressure on Saudi again, like the one practised earlier during October 1973 war), and because of this many Americans are afraid of their dependence on the Eastern energy, which shall come to an end.
Economics is another broad line; Iraq is a third; Democracy and terrorism and many other broad lines which will identify the agendas of the candidates and the voters.
Most of the Americans are afraid in this stage of a recurrence of what happened in the sixties of the last century, including the time called the Great Depression, economic collapse or so, very high unemployment rates, all what is going on now under the administration of President Bush is a prelude to the recession, other than that, reports and polls confirm that most Americans expect that the coming year 2008 they will have another recession.
The political program of the ruling Republican Party is now talking about Bush's battle and the transfer of justice to Afghanistan and Iraq. In my opinion the program is nothing but deception once more, deceiving the Americans before us.
So, the Republicans do not have the will to fix many of those mistakes that they committed in the Middle East which affected the American internal unity for sure, from economics, politics, media, and for sure the society which started to fight the minorities, and mainly the Arabic and Muslim minorities, and there are many evidences of that.
I am not saying that Hilary Clinton with her Democratic Party and its political program that tends to build a strong and respectable America is totally right, or that such program will even please the Arabs (whose leaders consider America … everything), but for me, I think the American people will choose Hilary, maybe just for change to the better, or looking for the last hope to be saved, or at least looking for another strategy in the war of terrorism, that has been led by Bush for seven years, and is still going on. For sure the Liberals and Democrats there in America are dealing with Arabs and Muslims the same way like the Republicans, by considering them as terrorist groups with various ideologies, but united under the same goal which is causing harm to the United States, and may be not the States only, but the free world as a whole too.
Hilary is not the only candidate in the Democratic party, Barack Obama, is another strong candidate, and lately he achieved a significant success after appearing with Oprah Winfrey on TV.
Anyway, I am not a Democrat nor Republican. I am just watching and trying to evaluate the situation from a distance … a far distance.
He then tries to summarize the previous paragraphs, and added some examples to illustrate his point of view:
Overall, it is not possible to say that there is a radical difference in the perception of the Arab and Islamic world, between the Republican and Democratic parties, but certainly there are some outstanding issues, which the Democrats have totally different solutions than [the Republicans], for example, they both seem to agree on how to deal with the Palestinians and the Israelis, there is almost an unwritten agreement between the successive American administrations, that Israel is the spoiled child of the United States, and that the Palestinians must but put under pressure to make sacrifices for the sake of the Jewish people, and in favour of a just and comprehensive peace in the region. In my opinion … the only difference is that Madeleine Albright departed, and Condy succeeded her.
The agreement also is very acute with those repressive regimes that govern our countries and the silence of both of the American Democratic and Republican parties towards them. It is the same regime that tried to overthrow Chavez, and tried to overthrow Fidel Castro, but did not overthrow him because he is a dictator who works to suppress his people, as the ones we have, but he refused to become a tool in the hands of the American administration. On the other hand they are totally silent towards our regimes and their repressive and brutal deeds towards their own civilians, as in the case of the military trials of the Muslim Brotherhood, and the case with the electoral fraud, and the eternal power promoted by the President and ruling party in Egypt.
Of course I did not mention the economic vision of Democrats or compare it with that of the Republicans. I was just talking about the relationship between the American administration and the Islamic world in general.
The Islamic world is not expecting much from the American administration, but … many are waiting for the American (Democrats) way of dealing with reform and human rights issues to be different from that of the (Republican). And the American way of dealing with moderate Islamic movements must change, for instance, with the Muslim Brotherhood. The next administration must realize that the Muslim Brotherhood are not enemies.Labels: America, Arab world, Muslim Brotherhood |
| posted by AbdElRaHmaN Ayyash @ 8:36 PM |
|
|
|
|
My Name Is : AbdelRahman AyYash
I'm From : cairo, Egypt
And : I am just a guy, that wanna see his home "Egypt" in a great position in the civilized world , wanna talk to the other views' believers to hear from them and to make them listen to me , I'll try to show good model of a young Egyptian Muslim guy , who is believing in Islam as the only solution to all problems we face......
أنا مجرد شاب ، عاوز اشوف بلدي مصر ، في أحسن مكان وسط العالم المتحضر ، عاوز اتكلم مع أصحاب الرؤى المختلفة ، و عاوز اسمع منهم ، و عاوز اعمل من نفسي مثال كويس لشاب مصري ، مؤمن ان الاسلام هو الحل لكل مشاكلنا .
curious?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
